A quick look at the notes indicates that the DNS requirement was not communicated adequately. From this email string:
option value
150 x.x.x.21 x.x.x.20
DNS x.x.x.177 x.x.x.179
DNS Suffix ctac.thisdomain.com
Group note reads:
* MNS-must have 172 address.
* NAT disabled.
*DHCP
dhcp set address .2 - .254
dhcp set valueoption 150 x.x.x.21 x.x.x.20
dhcp set valueoption 6 x.x.x.177 x.x.x.179
dhcp set valueoption 15 ctac.thisdomain.com
system addbootpServer x.x.x.21
system addbootpServer x.x.x.20
So... the part that makes this hilarious... "DNS requirement was not communicated adequately"
Well, I look down through the Notes that he states are present (which is communicated adequately) and see that the DNS requirements are, in fact, very clearly communicated. There would be absolutely NO way that it could be mistaken for anything else.
So, long story short, he gets to make himself look an idiot by claiming something was not clearly communicated when, in actuality, it was very clear, if in syntax. For the people that it matters to, however, it could not be more clear.
Good HA HA for me today.


2 comments:
Super color scheme, I like it! Keep up the good work. Thanks for sharing this wonderful site with us.
»
Very pretty site! Keep working. thnx!
»
Post a Comment